RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Objective 5
- To: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>, Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Objective 5
- From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:43:27 -0500
That's at the Council level, not the DT level.
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:42 PM
To: 'Stéphane Van Gelder'; Avri Doria
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Objective 5
Right, my understanding is that if one House obtains full support and another
House has divided support (NCSG on one side, CSG on the other) that we still
have the required supermajority. If both Houses are divided, however, then we
need to find compromise language.
Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies XS4All Professor,
Delft University of Technology
Internet Governance Project:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 10:32 AM
> To: Avri Doria
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Objective 5
> Yes, we seem to have a deadlock situation right now with the NCSG and
> the RrSG supporting the Milton/Avri Obj 5 and the BC and the IPC
> supporting the Kristina Obj 5.
> This could be resolved by the RySG coming out in support of one
> version or the other, but it's now past deadline and there hasn't been
> a reaction from the registries.
> Brian, could you let us know which version the registries support
> I would then suggest we move ahead as we had planned to: the majority
> takes it. I would also suggest, as this is pretty evenly split up,
> that a not be included in the charter explaining which version of obj
> 5 was supported by whom. This could then be sent back to Council
> as-is, and for them to make a final determination.
> Margie, were you able to act on Avri's earlier proposal to bring the
> proposed agenda inline with recent developments? Do you have a
> definitive version of the charter that I can take back to the Council?
> Le 25 févr. 2010 à 15:48, Avri Doria a écrit :
> > Hi
> > so how do we resolve this split in the consensus?
> > does the council vote on the version of Objective 5 they like best?
> > or does the charter linger in the DT until we reach a consensus?
> > if the later, who can suggest a compromise wording?
> > a.