Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Call for agenda items

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think going through the proposals make sense as well.
Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
Vice President, Law & Policy
NeuStar, Inc.
Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx



----- Original Message -----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri Apr 02 18:24:45 2010
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Call for agenda items


Would be good for the proponent of each model to take 5 minutes and walk us 
through the detail of their proposal.  Not the pros and cons (yet) -- just how 
their proposal  would work

Also, would be good to start with a quick re-statement of definitions - so 
we're all speaking the same language. I've seen cross-ownership and vertical 
integration used interchangeably on this list,  though the WG has defined them 
differently.

RT


On Apr 3, 2010, at 6:33 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:

> 
> hi all,
> 
> we have a few agenda items (that won't take long and can go towards the end 
> of the agenda) for the call next Monday.  most of the time can be devoted to 
> whatever you all would like to discuss.
> 
> how would you like to use the time?  
> 
> the proposals, use-cases and scenarios seem to be evolving nicely on the 
> list.  would a discussion of some of those be useful?  any proposal-champions 
> want some real-time discussion time with the whole group?
> 
> are there background documents that would provide a good discussion?
> 
> we're building the agenda right now, so this is a good time to steer us 
> towards things that would help you advance your work.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
> Google, etc.)
> 
>