Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] The need to evaluate options in a consistent manner

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

All,

I must completely disagree with this whole line.  We are talking about changing 
a number of the underlying assumptions going into those discussions several 
years ago in the "working groups" which is the real place where policy is 
developed.  

If we cannot talk through the underlying assumptions of the whole 
registry-registrar model, then how can we talk about allowing new models at the 
registry-level?


Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
Vice President, Law & Policy
NeuStar, Inc.
Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx



----- Original Message -----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri Apr 09 16:22:24 2010
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] The need to evaluate options in a consistent manner


Avri:

Thanks for the clarification.  Yes, I read the referenced negotiations as being 
whether or not a registry could be affiliated with a registrar not whether a 
registry needed to use a registrar. 
> 
> does that mean we have to stop working on this?

Hope so! 

Best,

Jon