Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:18:12 -0400
I suggest that the purpose, and the content, of a poll be on the agenda.
I suggest that a two sentence summary of each proposal be on the
agenda, as a tool for future use when we need to refer to a proposal
as it is proposed.
I'm glad to know Mike is working on a summary and comparison. I
suggest that be on the agenda.
As for the economists, they've been pretty good about keeping on
message and not being distracted by industry-specific facts, so having
had several passes through their presentations, I suggest, that if the
co-chairs can schedule call time for those that haven't had these
prior happy opportunities, that this repetition of opinions not be on
the agenda, but on some other scheduled call time's agenda.
However, speaking to getting questions answered, please schedule 60
seconds or so to explain what the co-chairs' understanding of Staffs'
intentions to respond to questions presented directly, and through one
participant, four weeks ago. As you'll recall, two weeks ago the
co-chairs indicated that they would address this question to Staff,
and it would be useful to know if this is an infinite delay path, or
merely one with substantial delay, when additional questions to Staff