RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] FW: CBUC Position Statement on VI

["Hammock, Statton" <shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Berry, my apologies.

 

I misread the statement initially and it does reflect our position, at least as 
of August 2009.

 

Again, my apologies. 

 

Statton 

 

 Statton Hammock 
 Sr. Director, Law, Policy & Business Affairs 

 

P 703-668-5515  M 703-624-5031 <http://www.networksolutions.com> 
www.networksolutions.com

 

 

________________________________

From: Hammock, Statton 
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 11:38 AM
To: 'Glen de Saint Géry'; gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] FW: CBUC Position Statement on VI

 

Berry, 

 

Thanks for the summary. I need to correct, however, one statement that I 
believe is mischaracterizes Network Solutions position on the separation issue. 
 

 

In the second paragraph under "Developments" the BC Position states that 
"Network Solutions has called for a continuation of the structural separation 
requirements between registries and registrars, but some liberalization in the 
cross-ownership requirements."  That statement is incorrect as Network 
Solutions has not called for a continuation of structural separation 
requirements. 

 

I just wanted to make that clear.   

 

Thanks, 

 

Statton 

 

 Statton Hammock 

 Sr. Director, Law, Policy & Business Affairs 

P 703-668-5515  M 703-624-5031 www.networksolutions.com

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 2:44 PM
To: gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] FW: CBUC Position Statement on VI

 

 

 

The CBUC position to the VI WG  forwarded From: Berry Cobb 

 

 

VI WG,

 

Attached is the CBUC position statement from Aug 2009 regarding the issue of 
Vertical Integration.  While several CBUC members participate on the VI WG, no 
substantial change has occurred requiring modification to our consensus.  The 
CBUC reserves a change to our consensus position, if any, when the VI WG 
creates its final report and opens the final community comment period.

 

In summary, Our present consensus position basically aligns to the ICANN board 
resolution in Nairobi and we are pleased with the substantial and adequate 
discussion with respect to VI/CO & also Single Registrant TLDs.  The CBUC looks 
forward to the analysis of proposals by the VI WG and we are optimistic a 
solution will be created to match the expansion of gTLDs.

 

Any specific questions to the CBUC can be filed through Berry Cobb.

 

Thank you.

 

Berry Cobb

Infinity Portals LLC