<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: Proposed draft message to ICANN staff
- To: "briancute@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <briancute@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Brian Cute'" <briancute@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: Proposed draft message to ICANN staff
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 13:15:56 -0400
Apologies accepted. Where do we send medical bills for heart palpitations?
Alan
At 12/05/2010 01:02 PM, Brian Cute wrote:
Apologies for the reference to the ?call today?
since there is none. Can we discuss this on the list?
From: Brian Cute [mailto:briancute@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 12:59 PM
To: 'Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Proposed draft message to ICANN staff
Mikey and Roberto,
I took the liberty of drafting a possible
message from the VIWG to the ICANN staff in
relation to the deadline of May 14 for
submissions to be included in DAG4. (I hope you
don?t mind.) Could we discuss this item on the call today?
Regards,
Brian
Dear Kurt,
As Co-Chairs of the Vertical Integration Working
Group, we write to you concerning the
approaching deadline for submissions to be
included in DAG4. As of today, the VIWG does
not have a proposal to submit for inclusion in
DAG4. The VIWG has been working hard ? with
roughly 60 participants, weekly meetings and
over 1500 email exchanges in a serious attempt
to produce a consensus based proposal. While
the VIWG does not have a specific proposal at
this time, we will continue to work toward the
goal of presenting a consensus based proposal to
the GNSO Council (and the Board) in advance of
ICANN?s Brussels meeting. The VIWG requests
that Staff consider keeping a placeholder in
DAG4 that notes the above expression from the
VIWG pending our final report up to the GNSO Council.
Best regards,
Roberto Gaetano
Mikey O?Connor
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|