Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Proposed draft message to ICANN staff

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

I also agree with Tim.

Stéphane

Le 12 mai 2010 à 21:36, Avri Doria a écrit :

> 
> +1
> 
> a.
> 
> Ps. It is nice to know that Kurt and the Board agree.
> 
> 
> On 12 May 2010, at 21:08, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Brian,
>> 
>> Given Kurt's recent email to the list, I don't see any point in sending
>> this note.
>> 
>> 
>> Tim
>> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Proposed draft message to ICANN staff
>> From: "Brian Cute" <briancute@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wed, May 12, 2010 11:58 am
>> To: <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Mikey and Roberto,
>> 
>> I took the liberty of drafting a possible message from the VIWG to the
>> ICANN staff in relation to the deadline of May 14 for submissions to be
>> included in DAG4.  (I hope you don’t mind.)  Could we discuss this
>> item on the call today?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Brian
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Dear Kurt,
>> 
>> As Co-Chairs of the Vertical Integration Working Group, we write to you
>> concerning the approaching deadline for submissions to be included in
>> DAG4.  As of today, the VIWG does not have a proposal to submit for
>> inclusion in DAG4.  The VIWG has been working hard – with roughly 60
>> participants, weekly meetings and over 1500 email exchanges in a serious
>> attempt to produce a consensus based proposal.  While the VIWG does not
>> have a specific proposal at this time, we will continue to work toward
>> the goal of presenting a consensus based proposal to the GNSO Council
>> (and the Board) in advance of ICANN’s Brussels meeting.  The VIWG
>> requests that Staff consider keeping a placeholder in DAG4 that notes
>> the above expression from the VIWG pending our final report up to the
>> GNSO Council.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Roberto Gaetano
>> Mikey O’Connor
>> 
>> 
> 
>