<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Regarding the Nairobi Board Resolution
- To: "'Milton L Mueller'" <mueller@xxxxxxx>, "'Alan Greenberg'" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'avri@xxxxxxx'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "'Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx'" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Regarding the Nairobi Board Resolution
- From: "Drazek, Keith" <Keith.Drazek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 12:29:48 -0400
Wrong. I want to know if they intend to do something different than the Board
resolution for DAG4, and if so, how.
-----Original Message-----
From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 12:18 PM
To: Drazek, Keith; 'Alan Greenberg'; Neuman, Jeff; 'avri@xxxxxxx';
'Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Regarding the Nairobi Board Resolution
In other words, you'd like the staff to make the policy for us.
> -----Original Message-----
> I'd like to know if/how the staff will interpret the Board's resolution
> for DAG4. I think it's reasonable for the VIWG to be informed by that
> now rather than waiting, and I don't see any harm in pressing the Staff
> for it.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|