ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] OUR WG TABLE - For Final Inputs!

  • To: "Jeff Eckhaus" <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] OUR WG TABLE - For Final Inputs!
  • From: "Kathy Kleiman" <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 17:17:51 -0400

Tx Jeff!

Kathy Kleiman
Director of Policy
.ORG The Public Interest Registry
Direct: +1 703 889-5756  Mobile: +1 703 371-6846

Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr
See our video library on YouTube

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry.  If 
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jeff Eckhaus
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 4:57 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] OUR WG TABLE - For Final Inputs!


All,

I have attempted to update the spreadsheet with the points from the original DM 
proposal, but wanted to add that this was a proposal, not the current standing 
on all points and issues. I think this is an important point people need to 
understand. The original idea was to put together the proposals in a 
spreadsheet, not what everyone's current outlook is and what they would agree 
to.


I also wanted to point out that the cell that asked for the "emphasis" point 
was something that we did not specifically propose but feel needs to be 
emphasized since it is a critical factor in open competition in the TLD space.
 I will use the words from the JN2 proposal since it captures the idea best 
"Registry Operator or its Affiliate can co-own an  ICANN-Accredited Registrar 
in a TLD other than the TLD for which Registry Operator or its Affiliate serves 
as the Registry"


Jeff Eckhaus




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:31 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] OUR WG TABLE - For Final Inputs!

Attached is updated for Go Daddy's proposal.

Tim  
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] OUR WG TABLE - For Final Inputs!
From: berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, May 14, 2010 9:26 am
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx


VIWG,

I took the liberty to make some formatting and spell check changes to the 
matrix. Hopefully this will make it a bit easier to read.

Thanks.

Berry Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.infinityportals.com
866.921.8891



From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 6:13 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] OUR WG TABLE - For Final Inputs!

All,
This is it, the moment you have been waiting for - the New VI WG Table.

It needs your help! I reviewed and revised a few table categories with those 
who had suggestions on our last call (special tx to Jon N).
Now, it is your turn. If you/your company/your constituency submitted a 
proposal, **please review the table and update it with your ideas, your 
conclusions, your words.** Updates should go to the whole group, or to me and 
Mikey (both,
please) by ** Sunday morning**.

There are new categories for clearer understanding of Equal Access and Ry/Rr 
structure proposed in the exceptions.
Added/Revised:
Column G: Ry must accept (1) all IA Rrs (gTLD model) OR (2) may select among IA 
Rrs based on special, objective criteria (sponsored TLD model) Column H: 
Non-Discrimination Among Rrs (Technology, Customer Support,
Etc)
Column L: Under threshold: (1) Ry may distribute directly (subject to RAA-type 
obligations) OR (2) Ry may co-own a Rr > 15% to distribute TLD Column M: Equal 
Access Required Below Threshold?

Otherwise, it?s the same. Tx for filling it in (you don?t want to rely on me ? 
I wrote one of the proposals!) Best,

Kathy Kleiman
Director of Policy

.ORG The Public Interest Registry
1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 200
Reston, Virginia 20190 USA

Main: +1 703 889-5778 | Direct: +1 703 889-5756
Mobile: +1 703 371-6846 | Fax: +1 703.889.5779
E: kkleiman@xxxxxxx | W: www.pir.org

Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr See our video library on YouTube

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. 
If received in error, please inform sender and then delete.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy