Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] clarification

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On this last 'clarification', I do not believe that is an issue we arrived at a 
conclusion about.

a.

On 30 May 2010, at 08:50, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> In response to some discussions regarding the CAM proposal, I want to say 
> that it allows for a Registry or RSP  to own up to 100% of a Registrar (and 
> vice-versa) if the Registrar or its affiliates do not distribute that TLD, 
> and that defined steps to mitigate harm are taken along with penalties and 
> sanctions. If the Registry or RSP would like to distribute the TLD through 
> the co-owned Registrar they would need to go through the CESP process as 
> described in the CAM proposal. This was not stated explicitly in our original 
> email because we did not see why anyone would object to 100% co-ownership if 
> there was no distribution of the TLD.
> 
> Milton Mueller
> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
> XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology
> ------------------------------
> Internet Governance Project:
> http://internetgovernance.org
>