<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Proposal-support poll
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Proposal-support poll
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:29:21 -0400
Hi,
I am happy that both the DAGv4 and Board Original are there to distinguish
between 2% and 0%.
a.
On 10 Jun 2010, at 16:20, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>
> Mikey,
>
> Just filled in the Doodle poll but I find it confusing. For example, all 4
> registrars on the "4 registrars" entry have supported the JN2. I thought we
> were doing that to exercise some sort of consensus and reduce the number of
> options on the table, but find that both are still in the poll. So of course,
> I have indicated support for both, but I don't know if that's the right way
> to go about it.
>
> Also, why have 2 separate entries for DAGv4 and the Board Resolution, as
> DAGv4 is the implementation version of the Board Resolution?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
> Le 10 juin 2010 à 22:04, Mike O'Connor a écrit :
>
>>
>> hi all,
>>
>> as we discussed on the call, it's time to assess the level of support for
>> the various proposals that we have on the table. please take a moment to
>> fill out this Doodle poll.
>>
>> http://www.doodle.com/3pzabi8d9frrpvb7
>>
>> thanks!
>>
>> mikey
>>
>>
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone 651-647-6109
>> fax 866-280-2356
>> web www.haven2.com
>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
>> Google, etc.)
>>
>>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|