Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Proposal-support poll

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

argh...

i got Jeff's email after building the poll -- that's why 4-registrars is still 
on there.  sorry about that.  i think your approach of indicating support for 
both is the right way to go.

i debated leaving the Board resolution off (you can tell by it's position -- 
last on the list).  i decided to put it back in just in case there are people 
who prefer the more aggressive 0% position that the Board originally proposed.  

mikey


On Jun 10, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:

> Mikey,
> 
> Just filled in the Doodle poll but I find it confusing. For example, all 4 
> registrars on the "4 registrars" entry have supported the JN2. I thought we 
> were doing that to exercise some sort of consensus and reduce the number of 
> options on the table, but find that both are still in the poll. So of course, 
> I have indicated support for both, but I don't know if that's the right way 
> to go about it.
> 
> Also, why have 2 separate entries for DAGv4 and the Board Resolution, as 
> DAGv4 is the implementation version of the Board Resolution?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 10 juin 2010 à 22:04, Mike O'Connor a écrit :
> 
>> 
>> hi all,
>> 
>> as we discussed on the call, it's time to assess the level of support for 
>> the various proposals that we have on the table.  please take a moment to 
>> fill out this Doodle poll.
>> 
>>      http://www.doodle.com/3pzabi8d9frrpvb7
>> 
>> thanks!
>> 
>> mikey
>> 
>> 
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone        651-647-6109  
>> fax                  866-280-2356  
>> web  www.haven2.com
>> handle       OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
>> Google, etc.)
>> 
>> 

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)