<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] REVISED Proposal-support poll
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] REVISED Proposal-support poll
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:43:31 -0400
Hi,
that is what I have assumed it meant all along.
silly me.
of course doodle only has 3 states as far as i know.
by the way any objection to people not on the VI list, but who have been
following, taking the poll?
Also we have more than 25 members on the VI list. where are the others?
a.
On 11 Jun 2010, at 16:04, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>
> Too late now, but in retrospect, a fourth option of "I could accept this WITH
> some modification" might have been interesting. I would have included JN2 in
> that category, as an example.
>
> Alan
>
> At 10/06/2010 04:39 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>
>> i so horked up the poll i decided to redo it. same URL, but i deleted the 4
>> answers that were there -- so please revisit the poll if you filled it out.
>> apologies for that.
>>
>> http://www.doodle.com/3pzabi8d9frrpvb7
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> mikey
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone 651-647-6109
>> fax 866-280-2356
>> web www.haven2.com
>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
>> etc.)
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|