<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] REVISED Proposal-support poll -- consensus around "atoms"
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] REVISED Proposal-support poll -- consensus around "atoms"
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:02:00 -0400
On 6/13/10 11:48 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> ...
> Eric, i took another look at your poll and lean toward a simpler Doodle
> poll for a couple of reasons.
It is sufficient that after 8 weeks the co-chairs have found policy
element test questions as an alternative beauty contests among the
proposals of record, all of which began as quickly assembled bits of
policy, and are just as quickly re-assembled and modified to acquire
support, with some loss of coherency.
The features of various poll applications are of no particular importance.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|