Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I, too, am concerned about the polls, as previously noted and therefore 
underscore Tim's comments below. 

Kind regards, 

RA 

------Original Message------
From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
To: gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
ReplyTo: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Jun 14, 2010 22:53
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time


I'm concerned abt how these polls will be used in the report. I agree with 
Kathy abt the value of the matrix and its use in the report, but these polls 
are confusing.

I will try to get to the current poll later this week (traveling a lot until 
Friday), but suggest that the poll results not be used in the report to Council.

Tim

------Original Message------
From: Mike O'Connor
Sender: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
To: Avri Doria
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time
Sent: Jun 14, 2010 2:28 PM


hi all,

we had a pretty lively conversation on the call about the new poll and 
concluded that we need a redo that makes the choices/answers easier to 
understand.  Doodle seems to be at it's limit.  so i've closed the Doodle one 
and will push a new one (probably SurveyMonkey based, since i've got an 
account) Real Soon Now.

thanks,


mikey


- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)






________________________________________
Ron Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.rnapartners.com