Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] taking your temperature on another face to face meeting

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

hi Ron,

sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but there are a bunch of meetings that 
conflict at 10am.  

mikey


On Jun 21, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Ron Andruff wrote:

> 
> Mikey,
> 
> The DNS abuse session has particular importance to this WG.  How does
> 10:00-11:00 look for others?
> 
> RA
> 
> Ronald N. Andruff
> RNA Partners, Inc.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 4:32 AM
> To: Rosette, Kristina
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] taking your temperature on another face to face
> meeting
> 
> 
> thanks Kristina.
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:21 AM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I have a conflict then and will try to find a proxy. 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
>> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 4:11 AM
>> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] taking your temperature on another face to
>> face meeting
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 'seems like another face to face gathering works for a lot of people...
>> 
>> i'm looking at my handy-dandy online version of the Brussels meeting
>> calendar (courtesy of CloudRegistry -- here's the link --
>> http://www.cloudregistry.net/shared/icann38-brussels.ics ) and here's
>> what i see when i look at Ken's ideas:
>> 
>> 11am on Wednesday -- conflicts with the GNSO Council open meeting (which
>> is the meeting that precedes ours in the Gold room).  so that looks
>> tough.
>> 
>> 8am on Thursday -- conflicts with ALAC leaders meeting and Security
>> Strategic Initiatives.  that looks bad for a different gang.
>> 
>> how about this:
>> 
>> 11:00-13:00 on Thursday -- only conflict is with the Forum on DNS abuse
>> (sorry Margie)
>> 
>> check your schedules.  i'm looking for howls of protest between now and
>> early afternoon -- if i hear none, i'll get going on finding us a room.
>> if you DO have conflicts, see if you can appoint a proxy who can
>> represent your views...
>> 
>> mikey
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 20, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Ken Stubbs wrote:
>> 
>>> Ken Stubbs wrote:
>>> why not start wed meeting at 11am .. this gives us an extra 1 1/2 hrs 
>>> & there is little on the wed schedule at that time
>>> 
>>> or thursday at 8 or 830am.  not much scheduled against that either
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 6/20/2010 5:45 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>>>> hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> just curious -- what is your interest in another face-to-face session
>> this week?  i know, it's unreasonable.  but this might be the
>> opportunity to get closer to closure and thus advance the schedule.
>>>> 
>>>> as many of you know, we heard a pretty clear message from the Council
>> today -- "move as quickly as you can."
>>>> 
>>>> whatcha think?  another Doodle poll?
>>>> 
>>>> mikey
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> - - - - - - - - -
>>>> phone      651-647-6109
>>>> fax                866-280-2356
>>>> web        www.haven2.com
>>>> handle     OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
>> Google, etc.)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
> etc.)

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)