ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] New proposal variant

  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] New proposal variant
  • From: Volker Greimann - Key-Systems GmbH <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:45:08 +0200


Hi Alan,

I like it. Consider it stolen and implemented in my Law and Order suggestion.

Volker
________________________________________
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Alan Greenberg [alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:51 AM
To: VI
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] New proposal variant

I would like to propose a variant. It could be applied to a proposal that allows 
registry/registrar integration for marketing TLDs other than those offered by the 
registry (such as JN2) or perhaps to allow the "Afilias et al" proposal to 
allow such relationships. The proposal provides more specificity to my previous 
statements that VI rules could be relaxed if the registrars involved in the VI 
relationship were bound by explicit contractual conditions.

In essence, it puts disclosure and reporting requirements on the registrar and 
its partners (partners being loosely defined) and explicitly commits them to 
not deal, directly or indirectly, in their registry's own TLDs.

Any registrar involved (with >15% ownership or control) must disclose the 
details of:
- Their family of registrars - owned or controlled (same definition) by them, 
or co-owned/controlled.
- All owned/controlled resellers that they deal with, directly or indirectly.

All of these entities will be bound by direct contract with ICANN to abide by a 
set of rules (which among others proscribe dealing with the domain(s) offered 
by the registry arm). The ownership/control relationships will be made public. 
There would be a requirement for ongoing reports certifying compliance and 
strict, severe penalties for non-compliance.

Among other things, this would contractually restrict two cases which previous 
proposals have not addressed.

a) Consider the scenario where J owns registry X and registrar Y. X and Y are 
both owned by J but are not otherwise related. As such, the registry agreement 
signed by X can in no way bind Y. This variant now binds Y to specific 
disclosure and reporting terms associated with VI.

b) Registry X and registrar Y have some sort of >15$ ownership or control. Y 
has a controlled reseller R. R also resells for a completely unrelated registry P. 
Under prior rules, R could market the X TLDs (routing registrations through P). 
This variant precludes such marketing arrangements.

In summary this proposal variant puts new contractual marketing restrictions, disclosure 
and reporting terms on those registrars who want to play in the VI sandbox. It also 
requires contracts with controlled resellers. These are just agreement to restrict 
marketing, disclosure and reporting requirements, and not monetary, so they do not form a 
new class of "contracted party". One could think of this as a form of 
certification of such resellers.

The overall intent is not to eliminate any potential gaming - nothing can do 
that. But it does give ICANN compliance a basis to recognize potential 
infractions and, if found, it gives them tools to achieve compliance.

This proposal variant is being suggested without being fully fleshed out, but 
given the timing, I thought it should go out earlier rather than later.

Alan



--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Prager Ring 4-12
66482 Zweibrücken
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 861
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.key-systems.net/facebook
www.twitter.com/key_systems

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 1861 - Zweibruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede 
Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist 
unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per 
E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Prager Ring 4-12
DE-66482 Zweibruecken
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 861
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.key-systems.net/facebook
www.twitter.com/key_systems

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 1861 - Zweibruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this 
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an 
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the 
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.








<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy