Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] CONSENSUS POLL OPEN -- please complete it before our call on Thursday

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

<grin>  i love that sharp cry of panic.  :-)

so let's just keep going folks -- please try to get your poll completed several 
hours before the call tomorrow.

mikey


On Jul 14, 2010, at 11:37 AM, tim@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> No! I was hoping I wouldn't have to spend another hour doing it over. I think 
> most of the issues raised can be addressed in the reporting.
> 
> Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:32:12 
> To: Tim Ruiz<tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jon Nevett<jon@xxxxxxxxxx>; 
> Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx<Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>; Jeff 
> Eckhaus<eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] CONSENSUS POLL OPEN -- please complete it before 
> our call on Thursday
> 
> i think the changes are relatively minor and probably won't change the 
> result.  but if people would like, i can easily kick the poll off again.
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> On Jul 14, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Do we have to redo the poll? 
>> 
>> Tim  
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] CONSENSUS POLL OPEN -- please complete it
>> before our call on Thursday
>> From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wed, July 14, 2010 10:11 am
>> To: Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx"
>> <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> 
>> hi Jeff,
>> 
>> thanks for the acknowledgement of my awesomeness. :-)
>> 
>> i've touched, and i hope fixed, all but the last point in your list
>> Jeff. take a look and see how i did. i await the will of the group on
>> point 5.
>> 
>> here's a new link to preview the poll without having to actually take
>> it. it obsoletes the one below, which points to the old version.
>> 
>> http://bit.ly/afCGve
>> 
>> mikey
>> 
>> 
>> On Jul 14, 2010, at 12:04 AM, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
>> 
>>> A couple of quick comments on the poll:
>>> 
>>> 1- Awesome job putting this together. It looks great
>>> 2 - The opening line of the BRU1 statement begins "There was strong 
>>> consensus................" This is misleading as there was strong consensus 
>>> of the RACK group that wrote BRU1. None of the other proposals state this 
>>> and ask this be corrected immediately as it is misleading
>>> 3 - Question 21 asks in addition to 2. Are these questions linked? It seems 
>>> they are.
>>> 4 - Why are we expressing minority opinions in Question 34? If Kathy 
>>> Kleinman is opposed to Question 34 she can answer opposed. The other groups 
>>> may have had consensus but I did not hear unanimous consent from other 
>>> groups. They did not list all dissenting opinions from each member
>>> 5 - I thought that BRU2 allowed self distribution up to the de-minimus 
>>> amount , 2% or 5%. may need some help from others in group on this
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Jeff Eckhaus
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
>>> Behalf Of Mike O'Connor [mike@xxxxxxxxxx]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 6:40 PM
>>> To: Jon Nevett
>>> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] CONSENSUS POLL OPEN -- please complete it 
>>> before our call on Thursday
>>> 
>>> hi Jon,
>>> 
>>> egad... what a good idea.
>>> 
>>> here's a link to a "preview" of the poll -- it looks just like the poll, 
>>> except it doesn't collect results. the only trick is, you have to put 
>>> *something* in the required "name" question to get to the next page. my 
>>> favorite answer is usually "sdsdsd"... your choice.
>>> 
>>> http://bit.ly/afCGve
>>> 
>>> m
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jul 13, 2010, at 7:57 PM, Jon Nevett wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Mikey:
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for your hard work on this. Would you publish the poll questions 
>>>> for review in an e-mail . . . just in case something got lost in the 
>>>> translation in one of the questions.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> Jon
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:28 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> thanks for all your hard work on various proposals, atoms, etc.
>>>>> 
>>>>> i've spent the afternoon cutting and pasting and have a (pretty long) 
>>>>> poll put together for you. i found that i reviewed your work pretty 
>>>>> carefully and learned a lot as i put the poll together. i'm hoping it 
>>>>> will prompt you to look through your collective work with "fresh eyes" as 
>>>>> you complete it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> here's the link to the poll
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/Initial-report-poll
>>>>> 
>>>>> PLEASE try to complete it by 3 hours before our call on Thursday to give 
>>>>> me a bit of time to scratch together a preliminary summary.
>>>>> 
>>>>> note -- i didn't get updated versions of the SRSU or Compliance writeups, 
>>>>> so they're cobbled together from the drafts we had for the Monday call. 
>>>>> try to imagine where we might take them as we continue to refine these 
>>>>> drafts over the next few weeks (while the public comment period is open) 
>>>>> when expressing your support...
>>>>> 
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> mikey
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> - - - - - - - - -
>>>>> phone 651-647-6109
>>>>> fax 866-280-2356
>>>>> web http://www.haven2.com
>>>>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
>>>>> etc.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> - - - - - - - - -
>>> phone 651-647-6109
>>> fax 866-280-2356
>>> web http://www.haven2.com
>>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
>>> etc.)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may 
>>> include privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand 
>>> Media, Inc. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other 
>>> than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying 
>>> to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
>> 
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone 651-647-6109 
>> fax 866-280-2356 
>> web http://www.haven2.com
>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
>> etc.)
>> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   http://www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
> Google, etc.)
> 

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)