<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10] Recommendation: Eliminate Section 4 of the Initial Report
- To: "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Recommendation: Eliminate Section 4 of the Initial Report
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:05:06 -0400
All,
In reading the Initial Report, I couldn't help but feel that the inclusion of
Section 4 is inappropriate. Not only is it inaccurate to state that we
evaluated the Salop report, we in actuality never really discussed it. We had
1 call with the economists and there was such large disagreement with many of
the statements made by the economists. In addition, there were several points
the economists made that were not in the initial report at all; Namely that
requiring the use of registrars at all is economically inefficient.
My point is not to debate the above, but to recommend we delete the section.
It improperly gives too much attention to a report we did not really consider.
It may be staff's position, but it is not the view of the WG and therefore
needs to go.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx> /
www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|