Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Notes on VI Draft Section 5.1

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Just finished my first read through (quick scan) and for some reason  on my
Open Office version all of page 63 and top part of page 64 are overprinted
(double exposure look) and unreadable => is it just me :?

Also re the latest Poll not withstanding our discussions on todays call and
other points raised  recently on the validity of and IF the data should be
referred to at all; => *if* it is included  I would have thought
that summary information and or charts of it were better to use (in as much
as it showed "work/activity done), rather than the highly suspect raw data
set of "responses"  that so many of us have criticized and well
invalidated...


Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 16 July 2010 17:46, Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> Here are some notes on the VI Draft Section 5.1 (compliance) -- I may have
> others later.
>
> While I agree that there was general agreement that ICANN needs to enforce
> compliance with its contracts, I do not think that there was much discussion
> or agreement on the kitchen sink approach of the compliance drafting group.
>   Section 5.1 contains numerous specific recommendations that were not fully
> aired (if at all) and for which no consensus exists, in my mind.  Some of
> the recommendations also presuppose the adoption of a specific model -- for
> instance, the idea of "Chinese Walls," which are irrelevant for either the
> free trade model, the DAGv4 recommendation or (possibly) the CAM model.
>
> Many of the recommendations, while they may be effective for compliance,
> are internal to the registry or registrar concerned.  I don't think that we
> are suggesting that ICANN would mandate any of the following (at least I
> hope we are not):
>
> -- Senior Management Involvement/Commitment to Compliance – Senior
> Management must be accountable and responsible for violations; compliance
> should be a corporate value
> -- Bottom-up compliance – training of employees is critical to establishing
> bottom-up compliance
> -- Screening – active screening/sampling for potential problems [if this is
> meant as a recommendation within a company; I think it is highly problematic
> also if it's something that ICANN would undertake]
> -- Internal reporting systems – opens a dialogue between management and
> employees
> -- Documented Training along pre-established Training outlines
> -- Remedial actions – corrective action; internal disciplinary action
>
> If undertaken by ICANN, the following compliance recommendations/items
> would, I suspect, meet with some opposition:
>
> -- Screening – active screening/sampling for potential problems
> -- Chinese walls – effective Chinese walls designed to prevent sharing of
> sensitive registry data with ongoing verification tools
>
> I would recommend removing lines 332 - 375.
>
> Antony
>
>
>
>
>