<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] JN2 summary in under 200 words
- To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] JN2 summary in under 200 words
- From: Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:31:25 -0400
I'd like to offer some edits to add some facts and remove some advocacy.
Thanks. Jon
The JN2 Proposal is intended to permit cross ownership between registries and
registrars, as long as cross-owned entities are not in a position of
controlling the other or possessing a greater than 15% ownership interest in
the other. The JN2 proposal contains definitions of affiliation, which include
both ownership (> 15%) and control (direct or indirect) and allows exceptions
for single registrant TLDs, community TLDs and Orphan TLDs. It restricts
Registry Operators and their affiliates from distributing names within the TLD
for which Registry Operator or its affiliate serves as the Registry Operator.
It allows registrars (and their affiliates) to be Registry Operators provided
they agree to not distribute names within a TLD for which they or their
affiliates serve as the Registry Operator. Restrictions do not apply to
back-end registry service providers (RSPs) that do not control the policies,
pricing or selection of registrars. After 18 months, any restricted RSP may
petition ICANN for a relaxation of those restrictions depending on a number of
factors. Cross ownership limitations extend to registrar resellers for 18
months. After that, market protections mechanisms must be in place. Registry
Operators may select registrars based on objective criteria and may not
discriminate among the ones they select.
Thanks.
Jon
On Jul 19, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
> Please find my short summary of the JN2+ proposal:
>
>
> The JN2+ Proposal is intended to restrict Registry Operators and their
> affiliates from distributing names within the TLD for which Registry
> Operator or its affiliate serves as the Registry Operator. That said, it
> recognizes that any proposal that outright prohibits a class of entities from
> applying to be a Registry Operator is not in line with ICANN’s mandate of
> promoting competition set forth in the ICANN Bylaws. Therefore it allows
> registrars (and their affiliates) to be Registry Operators provided they
> agree to not distribute names within a TLD for which they or their affiliates
> serve as the Registry Operator. The JN2 contains definitions of affiliation
> which includes both ownership (> 15%) and control (direct or indirect) and
> allows exceptions for single registrant TLDs, community TLDs and Orphan TLDs.
> For the first 18 months, restrictions apply towards back-end registry
> service providers (RSPs) that control policies, pricing or selection of
> registrars and resellers affiliated with the Registry Operator or RSP.
> After such time, they may petition ICANN for a relaxation of those
> restrictions depending on a number of factors.
>
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
> Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
> jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx / www.neustar.biz
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete
> the original message.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|