[gnso-vi-feb10] Executive Summary edit
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Executive Summary edit
- From: "Kathy Kleiman" <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:44:30 -0400
Apologies if this has already been mentioned, but isn't there a bit more to the
exceptions process that could be pointed out in the Executive Summary? Namely,
that in the Exceptions piece written by Tim/drafting team there is support not
just for an exceptions procedure [narrowly tailored], but specifically a focus
on the nature of the exceptions to be included.
In the interest of time, let me crib off directly off the Exceptions documents,
and the questions in the survey, and offer a short addition to the text:
ð [Executive Summary] Another principle that is moving toward a [consensus] of
the Working Group support is the principle that in the event ICANN adopts a
requirement of strict separation between registrars and registries, an
exceptions procedure should be incorporated into the New GTLD Program [start
addition] based on certain public interest needs where those needs would not
otherwise be addressed, possibly to included "community" TLDs and "orphaned"
TLDs. [end addition]
There was wide support for this, even greater than other exceptions already
noted in the paper.
Director of Policy
.ORG The Public Interest Registry
1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 200
Reston, Virginia 20190 USA
Main: +1 703 889-5778 | Direct: +1 703 889-5756
Mobile: +1 703 371-6846 | Fax: +1 703.889.5779
E: kkleiman@xxxxxxx <mailto:clee@xxxxxxx> | W: www.pir.org
Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz! <http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz>
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr <http://flickr.com/orgbuzz>
See our video library on YouTube <http://youtube.com/orgbuzz>
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.