RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Executive Summary edit

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I would prefer it end without the examples - "...otherwise be
addressed." There is no agreement that all community TLDs would be
considered, and same for orphan. There is no agreement on any specific
examples.

Tim 
 
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Executive Summary edit
From: "Kathy Kleiman" <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, July 19, 2010 11:44 am
To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>

Mikey, 
Apologies if this has already been mentioned, but isn’t there a bit
more to the exceptions process that could be pointed out in the
Executive Summary? Namely, that in the Exceptions piece written by
Tim/drafting team there is support not just for an exceptions procedure
[narrowly tailored], but specifically a focus on the nature of the
exceptions to be included.  
 
In the interest of time, let me crib off directly off the Exceptions
documents, and the questions in the survey, and offer a short addition
to the text: 
ð  [Executive Summary] Another principle that is moving toward a
[consensus] of the Working Group support is the principle that in the
event ICANN adopts a requirement of strict separation between registrars
and registries, an exceptions procedure should be incorporated into the
New GTLD Program [start addition] based on certain public interest needs
where those needs would not otherwise be addressed, possibly to included
“community” TLDs and “orphaned” TLDs. [end addition]
 
There was wide support for this, even greater than other exceptions
already noted in the paper.
 
Kathy Kleiman
Director of Policy
 
.ORG The Public Interest Registry
1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 200
Reston, Virginia 20190  USA
 
Main: +1 703 889-5778  | Direct: +1 703 889-5756  
Mobile: +1 703 371-6846 | Fax: +1 703.889.5779  
E:  kkleiman@xxxxxxx       |  W:  www.pir.org
 
Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr
See our video library on YouTube
 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry.  If
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.