RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Revised SRSU text

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

Avri,

If you or someone else on the WG has suggested (even if only reporting
suggestions from their respective SG) a .ngo SRSU, that's fine and you
should say so.  I thought Eric was saying that no one on the WG had
advocated for or suggested one and, in that case, it didn't seem
appropriate to keep it in the report.  (I also didn't read your previous
message as saying that you had.)

K 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 10:38 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Revised SRSU text


hi,

while i am putting out a minority report about suppression of various
issues, i hope that this too is not suppressed.

a.

On 20 Jul 2010, at 10:34, Rosette, Kristina wrote:

> If there is no "owner" of the .ngo suggestion, it should come out.  My

> email indicates that Eric suggested the language to me for the SRSU 
> text.  If it's not his suggestion more broadly and not anyone else's, 
> we should delete it.