<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Re: BRU1 Summary DIR-Final
- To: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Re: BRU1 Summary DIR-Final
- From: Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:47:53 -0400
They should be mentioned and summarized somewhere. We spent a great deal of
time on them in Brussels. I don't see a good reason not to include a summary
of the output, even if they didn't get broad support.
Thanks.
Jon
On Jul 20, 2010, at 10:33 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>
> that's my recollection. proposals get summaries, brussels exercises were just
> attempts to find areas of agreement, and better understand areas of
> disagreement, and so do not, being basically ephemeral and without actual
> authors.
>
> On 7/20/10 10:30 PM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
>> I thought there was push back in including a summary in Section 6 as
>> it was not a real proposal. It is why we have not drafted a summary of
>> BRU-1 for Section 6. Or am I way off base in my memory…..
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|