Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items

[Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mike,

This is just a point about uniformity of the format of proposals as featured
in the draft report.  On page 78, Rack + shows a list of supporters which
was possibly a section that the Rack + draft included to list co-proposers.
But in the draft report, Rack + happens to be the only proposal that shows a
list of supporters. Outsiders may get the impression (on a rapid glance)
that Rack + is the 'most supported' proposal, in the absence of a similar
list of supporters in the other proposals. So this part of the Rack +
proposal may please be deleted.


Sivasubramanian M




On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> again, sorry if this is "too much information" but we've just had an
> intense storm run through here.  i need to go see if i still have a road to
> drive on.
>
> i'm hoping a) to be back on the air in about an hour and b) to see a way
> forward on those two remaining issues when i get back.
>
> looks like we're seeing some conversation on Antony's thread.  Jeff, stir
> yourself one last time and help us get your issue closed.
>
> thanks,
>
> mikey
>
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone   651-647-6109
> fax             866-280-2356
> web     http://www.haven2.com
> handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
> etc.)
>
>
>