ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items

  • To: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Jean Christophe VIGNES'" <jcvignes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Sivasubramanian M'" <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Mike O'Connor'" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items
  • From: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:56:05 -0300


I support what Ron is saying. If others are
uncomfortable with this, they can follow
suit and list their proposers as well.

Tony Harris

----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "'Jean Christophe VIGNES'" <jcvignes@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "'Sivasubramanian M'" <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>; "'Mike O'Connor'" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 2:32 PM
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items



If the list of proposers for RACK+ is bothersome, why don't we simply note
the proposers for all proposals at the end of each so that Readers will know
from whom they came?  Would that solve the problem?

RA

Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.





-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jean Christophe VIGNES
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:09 PM
To: Sivasubramanian M; Mike O'Connor
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items


I fully agree. Besides the "supporters" for each proposal do appear clearly
in the Polls so that is at best redundant.

JC

Le 22/07/10 18:24, « Sivasubramanian M » <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

Mike,

This is just a point about uniformity of the format of proposals as featured
in the draft report.  On page 78, Rack + shows a list of supporters which
was possibly a section that the Rack + draft included to list co-proposers. But in the draft report, Rack + happens to be the only proposal that shows a
list of supporters. Outsiders may get the impression (on a rapid glance)
that Rack + is the 'most supported' proposal, in the absence of a similar
list of supporters in the other proposals. So this part of the Rack +
proposal may please be deleted.


Sivasubramanian M




On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

again, sorry if this is "too much information" but we've just had an intense
storm run through here.  i need to go see if i still have a road to drive
on.

i'm hoping a) to be back on the air in about an hour and b) to see a way
forward on those two remaining issues when i get back.

looks like we're seeing some conversation on Antony's thread.  Jeff, stir
yourself one last time and help us get your issue closed.

thanks,

mikey


- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109
fax             866-280-2356
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
etc.)





______________________
Jean-Christophe Vignes

Executive Vice-President & General Counsel
DCL Group
2, rue Léon Laval
L-3372 Leudelange

Tel.:  +352  20 200 123
Mobile : +352 691 600 424
Fax.:   +352 20 300 123
Mailto: JCVignes@xxxxxxxxxxx

www.datacenter.eu   | www.eurodns.com   | www.voipgate.com

________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have
received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and
delete it from your system. You must not copy the message or disclose its
contents to anyone.

Think of the environment: don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

--------------------------------------------------------






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy