Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Updated Summary and Revised Initial Report

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

looks ok to me.
thanks

a.

On 17 Aug 2010, at 11:30, Margie Milam wrote:

> Dear All,
>  
> Please find enclosed for your review the updated Summary of Public Comments 
> that includes the comments from yesterday’s call.   In preparing this 
> document,  I reviewed the comments to DAG v.4  but realized that it would be 
> a significant task to attempt to review and analyze all of the comments in a 
> short amount of time.   Instead, I included a reference to the DAG v. 4 
> comments in the body of the summary.  
>  
> Also, please review the attached Revised Initial Report that is redlined to 
> reflect the changes from the Initial Report.    I did not include  the 
> annexes, due to the size of the document.   The annexes will not change 
> except to add the Summary of Public Comment as Annex L to the Revised Initial 
> Report.
>  
> Finally, with regard to the comments on the motion received from Jeff Neuman, 
> I suggest that the motion be updated as follows:
>  
> Motion to Forward the Revised Initial Report on the Vertical Integration PDP 
> to the ICANN Board.
>  
> Whereas, on 28 January 2010, the GNSO Council approved a policy development 
> process (PDP) on the topic of vertical integration between registries and 
> registrars;
>  
> Whereas the VI Working Group has produced its Revised Initial Report and has 
> presented it to the GNSO Council on 18 August; and,
>  
> Whereas, the GNSO Council recognizes that the Revised Initial Report does not 
> include any recommendations that have achieved a consensus within the VI 
> Working Group, and instead reflects the current state of the work of the VI 
> Working Group;
>  
> Whereas, the GNSO Council has reviewed the Revised Initial Report, and 
> desires to forward the Revised Initial Report to the ICANN Board;
>  
> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
>  
> RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council appreciates the hard work and tremendous 
> effort shown by each member of the VI PDP working group in developing the 
> Revised Initial Report on an expedited basis;
>  
> RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Council hereby agrees to forward the Revised 
> Initial Report to the ICANN Board as a snapshot of the current state of the 
> ongoing deliberations of the VI Working Group with the understanding that the 
> VI Working Group will continue to work through these issues to attempt to 
> produce consensus recommendations in a final report.
>  
> RESOLVED FURTHER, that this resolution is not an endorsement or approval by 
> the GNSO Council of the contents of the Revised Initial Report at this time;  
>   
>  
> RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council directs Staff to make the appropriate 
> notifications to the ICANN Secretary and to the community.
>  
>  
>  
> As indicated by Mikey,  we will publish the Revised Initial Report tomorrow, 
> so please provide any comments to the attached documents by COB today.
>  
> Best Regards,
>  
> Margie
>  
> _____________
>  
> Margie Milam
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN
> _____________
> <Summary of public comments for Initial Report on VI_rev 4.doc><Revised 
> Initial Report Vertical Integration PDP WG 19 Aug 2010-v 1- no annexes.doc>