<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] GNSO Council -- VI motion fails for lack of a second
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] GNSO Council -- VI motion fails for lack of a second
- From: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:03:59 -0400
That's just plain old strange....
On Aug 26, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i just listened to the portion of the GNSO Council relating to our Working
> Group. here's the motion as it was made by Chuck Gomes.
>
> Motion made by: Chuck Gomes
>
> Whereas, on 28 January 2010, the GNSO Council approved a policy development
> process (PDP) on the topic of vertical integration between
> registries and registrars;
>
> Whereas the VI Working Group has produced its Revised Initial Report and has
> presented it to the GNSO Council on 18 August; and,
>
> Whereas, the GNSO Council recognizes that the Revised Initial Report does not
> include any recommendations that have achieved a consensus within the VI
> Working Group, and instead reflects the current state of the work of the VI
> Working Group;
>
> Whereas, the GNSO Council has reviewed the Revised Initial Report, and
> desires to forward the Revised Initial Report to the ICANN Board;
>
> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
>
> RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council appreciates the hard work and tremendous
> effort shown by each member of the VI PDP working group in developing the
> Revised Initial Report on an expedited basis;
>
> RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Council hereby agrees to forward the Revised
> Initial Report to the ICANN Board as a snapshot of the current state of the
> ongoing deliberations of the VI Working Group with the understanding that the
> VI Working Group will continue to work through these issues to attempt to
> produce consensus recommendations in a final report.
>
> RESOLVED FURTHER, that this resolution is not an endorsement or approval by
> the GNSO Council of the contents of the Revised Initial Report at this time;
>
> RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council directs Staff to make the appropriate
> notifications to the ICANN Secretary and to the community.
>
>
> it failed for lack of a second.
>
> i bet they appreciate all our hard work nonetheless. :-)
>
> mikey
>
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 651-647-6109
> fax 866-280-2356
> web http://www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
> Google, etc.)
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|