RE: [gnso-whois-dt] Staff suggested edits to WHOIS resolution

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Liz.  

If anyone is opposed to sending the motion as edited by l.iz, please say so by 
midday on Thursday PST.

Chuck


Sent from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com)

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Liz Gasster [mailto:liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Tuesday, January 27, 2009 09:10 PM Eastern Standard Time
To:     gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject:        [gnso-whois-dt] Staff suggested edits to WHOIS resolution

All,

I've inserted background text as requested and also made two additional 
possible "edits" in the attached redline version of the resolution first 
prepared so thoroughly by Steve Del Bianco.  The two edits I suggest are to:


1.       Delete data set 1 as explained in my earlier email.  It was the view 
of the WHOIS Hypotheses Working Group that GAC data set one should not be 
conducted as a separate study, but rather if that data is needed to conduct 
other studies, then the data would be gathered in that context.

2.       Raise again staff's concern about study #s 3 and 20, related to RAA 
provision 3.7.7.3.  As discussed on earlier calls, it is staff's view that this 
study cannot be conducted as set forth here, and I include possible alternative 
language in my comment shown in the redline attached.


As Chuck mentioned on the last call, our hope is to finalize this language and 
post to the Council list by Thursday 29 January, so that Council members can 
send it to their respective groups for review and comment in preparation for a 
possible vote on the motion at the 19 Feb Council meeting.



Thanks, Liz