<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-whois-dt] RE: [council] WHOIS motion from the Whois drafting team for Council consideration
- To: "Liz Gasster" <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-whois-dt] RE: [council] WHOIS motion from the Whois drafting team for Council consideration
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:58:19 -0500
Thanks Liz.
All Councilors: Please forward this ASAP to the groups you represent
for discussion.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 12:45 PM
To: GNSO Council
Cc: gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] WHOIS motion from the Whois drafting team for
Council consideration
All,
Attached and posted on the WHOIS discussion workspace is the
draft motion that the WHOIS studies drafting team has prepared for
Council consideration. (This is not for action on today's Council
call).
See:
https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?whois_references
Although not noted in the attached, staff has a concern about
Study Group E (studies 3 and 20), which involve RAA provision 3.7.7.3.
Staff does not believe the studies can be conducted as described in the
attached, and we have drafted alternative language that we think could
be the subject of a study of the relevant provision. I can elaborate at
the appropriate time, but I wanted to flag our concern as this language
is circulating.
Thanks, Liz
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|