RE: [gnso-whois-dt] ALAC WHOIS results

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Good question Steve.  I frankly haven't had time to focus on this.  I 
personally wouldn't have a problem with that.  

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve DelBianco [mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 12:25 PM
> To: Liz Gasster; Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-whois-dt] ALAC WHOIS results
> 
> Trying to see if/how ALAC scoring impacts the Council motion 
> on Whois studies.  Assuming we stayed with a 2.5 cutoff, we'd 
> add these 2 studies, right?
>      
> Area 3 GAC 7:   A growing share of registrants is protecting 
> the privacy of
> their Whois data by using proxy registrations and/or privacy services.
>      
> Area 6 Met b:  A party's use of a proxy/privacy registration 
> service reduces the party¹s ability to respond to a UDRP proceeding.
> 
> Do we intend to amend the council motion to these studies?
> ( https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?04_mar_2009_motions )
> 
> If so, I'd place GAC 7 with item 5 in our motion, which 
> includes proxy data and GAC 9 and GAC 10.
> 
> And Metallitz study b could go with item 3 in our motion, 
> which includes studies 3 and 20.
> 
> --Steve
> 
> 
> On 3/3/09 10:47 AM, "Liz Gasster" <Liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > All,
> > 
> > Yesterday the ALAC voted to approve the priorities 
> identified in the 
> > attached as the official ALAC view on WHOIS studies.
> > 
> > Thanks, Liz
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 9:29 AM
> > To: Council GNSO; gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Cheryl Langdon-Orr
> > Subject: [gnso-whois-dt] ALAC WHOIS results
> > 
> > Steve Metalitz just pointed out that I had not sent this as 
> I said I 
> > would at last week's Council meeting.  My apologies.
> > 
> > The ALAC is in the process of voting on this submission, and the 
> > result will be finalized on Monday, March 2nd.
> > 
> > The attached spreadsheet gives the ALAC priorities. It also 
> gives the 
> > averages before the ALAC vote, and after, with those above 
> 2.5 highlighted in green.
> > 
> > With a threshold of 2.5, the ALAC vote include two addition studies.
> > If the threshold is increased to 2.65, the final list 
> remains the same 
> > as before the ALAC submission.
> > 
> > Alan
> 
>