<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-whois-study] WHOIS study group call Tuesday 8 April 2008 at 15:00 UTC]
- To: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>, "Stéphane" Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-whois-study] WHOIS study group call Tuesday 8 April 2008 at 15:00 UTC]
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
Liz,
At issue is who will be conducting what studies?
If ICANN Staff has committed itself to a study on the
accuracy of the WHOIS directory by way of a person
soon to be hired, then this is somewhat different than
a study conducted by an independent third party for
the benefit of the GNSO and/or GAC. Are we to have
two different studies by two different parties on the
same topic?
If we agree that one party or more parties should be
conducting an accuracy study, then that narrows the
field of remaining possible studies once the exact
remit for the first study is understood.
Can you make it very clear for us exactly what the
Contractual Compliance Manager intends to study?
Thanks,
Danny
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|