ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-whois-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [Fwd: RE: [registrars] [Fwd: [gnso-whois-wg] Draft final report Whois group v 1.5]]

  • To: Doug Isenberg <disenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [Fwd: RE: [registrars] [Fwd: [gnso-whois-wg] Draft final report Whois group v 1.5]]
  • From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:38:17 -0700

(First, sorry for the previous message being in html and not being
trimmed.)

Doug, Tom said nominal not small. In fact, Tom was somewhat
contradictory in his remark, "a nominal fee ... to recover costs."

A nominal fee implies a token fee, possibly just enough to discourage
abuse. However, given everything being comtemplated in this report, a
fee to recover costs would be neither nominal nor small (as small is
likely defined in the minds of the majority of your constintuents).

Tim 


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [Fwd: RE: [registrars] [Fwd: [gnso-whois-wg] Draft final
report Whois group v 1.5]]
From: "Doug Isenberg" <disenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, July 20, 2007 8:30 am
To: <gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx>

Can anyone suggest what the actual "small fee" in this context might be,
since "small" may differ depending upon one's perspective.

Doug Isenberg








<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>