ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-whois-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-whois-wg] Comments on WWG report draft 1.5

  • To: <gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-whois-wg] Comments on WWG report draft 1.5
  • From: "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:10:01 -0400

Comment on Section 6 - Access to Undisplayed Whois data, and the
question of paying for access

Some have suggested that these access methods may cause a substantial
increase in costs to Registrars, and speculated on who would bear these
costs.  

Only time will tell, but there may well be incremental costs that
persist after Registrars and Accessors climb their initial learning
curves.  

If Registrars are unwilling to bear these costs, then all Registrants
should pay a nominal increase in domain name fees to cover such costs. 

Registrants are the beneficiaries of this change in Whois access policy,
and should therefore bear the costs, if any.


Steve DelBianco
NetChoice
Business Constituency member




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>