Re: [gnso-whois-wg] Comments on WWG report draft 1.5

[Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

that is certainly my recollection as well

Ken Stubbs

Ross Rader wrote:
> Maria Farrell wrote:
>
> > There was broad agreement at the Council level that the proposal as 
> > it stood
> > required significant development before the Council could consider
> > recommending it as policy to the ICANN Board. 
>
> That's one interpretation. My recollection of the council and 
> surrounding discussions was that with some additional effort, there 
> was an opportunity to make room for a compromise with law enforcement 
> interests which would likely also be sufficient to address the 
> majority of concerns we were hearing from the GAC. The net effect of 
> which would be to put the Council in a position to proceed with a 
> policy recommendation, despite the irresponsible actions of the 
> intellectual property community over the history of this issue.
>
> Of course, as I pointed out, this is a matter open to interpretation.