[gnso-whois-wg] Comments on WWG report draft 1.5

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

1. The Chair should include a detailed explanation as to how he used his
authority to determine agreement.

2. There a few places where it says *One Registrar* this or that. I
think it is now clear it is more than one registrar, at least three by
my count.

3. There should be more definitions in the glossary - cyber-squatting
for example.

4. An appendix should be added that details at the individual
participant level as to who agreed to what, and a detailed reference of
participants' stated interests so that it can be cross-referenced with
this appendix.

5. I DO NOT agree with any of the recommendations or statements as
written in the following sections:
   a. Sections 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4
   b. Sections 3.2 and 3.3.
   c. Section 4 in whole.
   d. Section 5.2.
   e. Section 6 in whole.


Tim