<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-whois-wg] Comments on WWG report draft 1.5
- To: "'Tim Ruiz'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'gnso-whois-wg'" <gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-whois-wg] Comments on WWG report draft 1.5
- From: "Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:18:22 +0200
Dear all,
I am in the final stages of preparing the extra material for this report.
That includes a glossary. If you have specific terms that you wish
explained, please let me know as soon as possible.
I will not be creating an appendix that details the opinions of each
participant on each point of this report. This is an impractical and
unreasonable request, and it goes against the purpose of this Working Group.
The purpose of the outcomes report is to aggregate the opinions of the
entire group - individual opinions have not been requested by the GNSO
Council and are inappropriate in a mixed group of constituency members and
observers. The statements of interest have already been collected for the
purpose of being included in the report.
May I please request that participants of this working group use the time
remaining to come to agreements, as Milton has suggested. Philip is out of
office at the moment, and Milton's suggestion seems a constructive one.
Best regards, Maria
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 1:45 PM
To: 'gnso-whois-wg'
Subject: [gnso-whois-wg] Comments on WWG report draft 1.5
1. The Chair should include a detailed explanation as to how he used his
authority to determine agreement.
2. There a few places where it says *One Registrar* this or that. I think it
is now clear it is more than one registrar, at least three by my count.
3. There should be more definitions in the glossary - cyber-squatting for
example.
4. An appendix should be added that details at the individual participant
level as to who agreed to what, and a detailed reference of participants'
stated interests so that it can be cross-referenced with this appendix.
5. I DO NOT agree with any of the recommendations or statements as written
in the following sections:
a. Sections 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4
b. Sections 3.2 and 3.3.
c. Section 4 in whole.
d. Section 5.2.
e. Section 6 in whole.
Tim
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|