<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-whois-wg] clarification of GAC relevance to GNSO WGs
- To: Suzanne Sene <ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, bdelachapelle@xxxxxxxxx, mueller@xxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [gnso-whois-wg] clarification of GAC relevance to GNSO WGs
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
Suzanne,
May we inquire as to the status of this requested
study? As I'm not aware of the ICANN Board having
chosen to honor this request as yet, one is prompted
to ask if the GAC will be commissioning and paying for
this study...
best wishes,
Danny
--- Suzanne Sene <ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> thanks, milton, for highlighting the term
> "concerns"; the lack of
> evidence/data regarding abuses of whois data also
> motivated the gac to
> call for a study of the uses and abuses of whois
> data. cheers, suz.
>
> Suzanne R. Sene
> Senior Policy Advisor
> NTIA/OIA
> 202-482-3167 (ph)
> 202-482-1865 (fax)
> >>> "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx> 07/27/07
> 1:42 PM >>>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suzanne Sene [mailto:ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>
> >i would also note that section 3.1 of the gac
> >principles states that the definition, purpose
> >and operation of whois services should reflect
> >section 2.
>
> Yes, and Section 2 recognizes that there are
> "legitimate concerns about
> the misuse of Whois data" and "conflicts with
> national privacy and data
> protection laws"
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|