Re: [gnso-whois-wg] Draft outcomes report v 1.6

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

It seems to me that the term "agreed" is very flexible and does not reflect
the dissent on many of the issues correctly. This should be changed
towards a more balanced desciption of the situation.

Best,

tom

Am 02.08.2007 schrieb Philip Sheppard:
> 
> Please find attached the outcomes report version 1.6.
> 
> This I hope captures the last two weeks of discussion on list and on our two 
> calls.
> Changes compared to v1.5 are:
> - new and clarified text;
> - revised levels of support;
> - revised section 7 (with text transferred from section 2);
> - new section 8 (further studies).
> (I considered issuing a red-line tracked version but there have been too many 
> changes to
> make this a useful tool.)
> 
> I would like to call a halt to changes of substance on the issues: these we 
> have well
> covered.
> I would like to invite any comments where you feel any opinion on the 
> substance is NOT yet
> recorded.
> Please do NOT repeat earlier opinion: that will just make life more 
> challenging to weed out
> duplication.
> Please do WITHDRAW earlier statements of disagreement if you now believe the 
> revised text is
> something that you can support.
> 
> Comments are open for one week until mid-day Thursday 9 August.
> 
> After that we will issue version 1.7 which will factor in any changes (as 
> above) along with
> factual and contextual additions from ICANN staff.
> 
> I will advise later how long version 1.7 will be up for comment before 
> completion of the
> group's work.
> Many thanks.
> 
> Philip Sheppard
> Chairman



Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w