RE: [gnso-whois-wg] Draft outcomes report v 1.6
I disagree strongly with this statement. At 05:32 PM 8/8/2007, Metalitz, Steven wrote: Regarding lines 689-691, it occurs to me that there is considerable support, and perhaps even agreement (though I am sure not unanimity), for the following statement: "OPOC implementation should wait until a viable and broadly supported mechanism for access under this section has been developed."
"I would also call attention to the GAC proposal for a study to "gather information on gTLD registrations and registrants and how Whois data is used and misused." This should also be listed as a topic for further study in Section 8." The study is now available at: <http://sanjuan2007.icann.org/files/sanjuan/ssac-whois-study-25Jun2007.pdf>http://sanjuan2007.icann.org/files/sanjuan/ssac-whois-study-25Jun2007.pdf.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and deleting this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
|