RE: [gnso-whois-wg] Draft outcomes report v 1.6

["Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Comments to the report:

Section 6.5 Line 638:   I oppose the Alternative View
Section 6.6 Line 651:  Add:  "and anti-phishing vendors" after "banking
sector"

Thanks,

Margie

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 6:42 AM
To: gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-whois-wg] Draft outcomes report v 1.6


Please find attached the outcomes report version 1.6.

This I hope captures the last two weeks of discussion on list and on our
two calls.
Changes compared to v1.5 are:
- new and clarified text;
- revised levels of support;
- revised section 7 (with text transferred from section 2);
- new section 8 (further studies).
(I considered issuing a red-line tracked version but there have been too
many changes to
make this a useful tool.)

I would like to call a halt to changes of substance on the issues: these
we have well
covered.
I would like to invite any comments where you feel any opinion on the
substance is NOT yet
recorded.
Please do NOT repeat earlier opinion: that will just make life more
challenging to weed out
duplication.
Please do WITHDRAW earlier statements of disagreement if you now believe
the revised text is
something that you can support.

Comments are open for one week until mid-day Thursday 9 August.

After that we will issue version 1.7 which will factor in any changes
(as above) along with
factual and contextual additions from ICANN staff.

I will advise later how long version 1.7 will be up for comment before
completion of the
group's work.
Many thanks.

Philip Sheppard
Chairman