<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-whois-wg] Proposed final version of the group's output report v1.8
- To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-whois-wg] Proposed final version of the group's output report v1.8
- From: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:24:51 -0400
Philip:
You said the comment close on August 20 and it is still Aug 20.
I have a very simple comment, and I know it applies to at least 4 and
probably as many as 10 members of the WG. By definition any point this
group
And it is, unfortunately, a comment I have made before.
It pertains to lines 847 - 852.
I reiterate, for the third time: there is NOT agreement as stated in
those lines. There is agreement only that LEAs should have access as
described in 6.2 and 6.3 and that private actors should have access as
described in 6.2.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 4:09 AM
To: gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-whois-wg] Proposed final version of the group's output
report v1.8
Please note comments on v 1.8 are now closed.
The group's final report will be distributed shortly.
Many thanks
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|