<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] FW: R-5 Whois Survey Question
- To: Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] FW: R-5 Whois Survey Question
- From: Susan Prosser <susan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 09:21:23 -0800
No problem.
I formatted my question into a "Yes/No" options. These can be radio
buttons or select boxes or such. The final format can be decided later.
My goal was to ensure accurate, digestible responses. Considering the
multi-lingual recipients, not having free form input boxes requiring
translation is important, IMO. My question was easy to do in such a
format. I'm not certain if the other questions will be as easy.
best,
-Susan
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> WSWG,****
>
> ** **
>
> A few WG members asked for an example of questions completed. Susan, I
> hope you do not mind, but I am forwarding your version out to the WG.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Berry Cobb****
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Email: *mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx**
> *Tel: +1 720 839 5735
> Skype ID: berry.cobb****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Susan Prosser [mailto:susan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:49 PM
> *To:* Berry Cobb
> *Subject:* R-5 Whois Survey Question****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Berry, ****
>
> Below is my suggested survey question for Inventory item R-5:****
>
> • Allow users to submit not only domain names as arguments to search
> functions but other registration data elements as well [16, 23].****
>
> Using the RAA Whois guidelines and various Registry agreements, I
> documented the various inputs available on Whois / Domain Name Registration
> Records. This is under the assumption that both the policy governing the
> data and the technical hurdles to allow such searching are resolved. It
> will, at minimum, uncover if there is a "problem to be solved." ****
>
> Survey Question: ****
>
> *1. Do you need to search Whois records by data elements other than
> domain name? *****
>
> [ ] Yes (displays 1.a section below) [ ] NO (ends question, does not
> display any additional information) ****
>
> 1.a YES -> Please indicate below with an [ X ] what data elements are
> important to be searchable* ****
>
> **understanding without standardized Whois data input format, not all
> elements will be supplied or available in standard format equally across
> all TLD's. *****
>
> Domain Name [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Primary Nameservers [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Secondary Nameservers [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Creation Date [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Last Updated Date [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Expiration Date [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Registrar [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Status [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Registrant ID [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Registrant Name [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Registrant Street Address 1 [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Registrant Street Address 2 [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Registrant City [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Registrant State/Province [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Registrant Country [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Registrant Telephone Number [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Registrant Fax Number [ ] YES [ ] NO ****
>
> Registrant Email [ ] YES [ ] NO ****
>
> Technical Contact Name [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Technical Contact Street Address 1 [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Technical Contact Street Address 2 [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Technical Contact City [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Technical Contact State/Province [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Technical Contact Country [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Technical Contact Telephone Number [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Technical Contact Fax Number [ ] YES [ ] NO ****
>
> Technical Contact Email [ ] YES [ ] NO ****
>
> Administrative Contact Name [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Administrative Contact Street Address 1 [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Administrative Contact Street Address 2 [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Administrative Contact City [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Administrative Contact State/Province [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Administrative Contact Country [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Administrative Contact Telephone Number [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Administrative Contact Fax Number [ ] YES [ ] NO****
>
> Administrative Contact Email [ ] YES [ ] NO ****
>
> ** **
>
> There are other factors to consider in opening up this search option.
> From here, we could go into further questions about type of search options
> ****
>
> *2. Do you need Include and Exclude search parameter options? [ ] YES
> [ ] NO*****
>
> *3. Do you need the ability to search by wild card? [ ] YES [ ] NO****
> *
>
> *4. Do you need the ability to search in non-ascii format? [ ] YES [
> ] NO*****
>
> ** **
>
> Also, if allowed to search by a non-domain name input, the results will be
> many, not singular. For instance if someone inputs XYZ Street, Anywhere
> they will receive 10+ results, not just 1. How will that data be
> reported? Are the RySG or RrSG able to support this? It really does open
> up a much larger issue. Do we need to tackle this point in this question?
> Or first discover the need and then determine technical solution? Please
> let me know. I can dig deeper into the questions if you feel we should
> consider that level detail. ****
>
> Thanks Berry. ****
>
> -Susan
>
> ~~~~~
> *Susan Prosser
> *VP, Marketing
> DomainTools, LLC
>
> T: (206) 838-9032
> F: (206) 838-9056
> E: *susan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *www.domaintools.com ****
>
> ** **
>
> *Follow Us*: Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pages/DomainTools/104523895739>
> | Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/domaintools> |
> LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/domaintools>
> | YouTube <http://www.youtube.com/domaintools> |
> Blog<http://blog.domaintools.com/>
> ****
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|