Re: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Survey Stats

[Barbara Roseman <barbara.roseman@xxxxxxxxx>]

We could also extend the deadline of the survey, as a supplementary
suggestion.

-Barb

On 10/25/12 8:59 AM, "Naffziger, Anne" <anaffziger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>I'm inclined to proceed with the follow-up email.  With the number of
>surveys sitting unfinished, it would be a shame not to have them
>completed for our report.
>
>Anne
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
>Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 11:01 PM
>To: gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Survey Stats
>
>
>Team,
>
>Don brings up a good point.
>
>Nowhere in the survey or the announcement do we specifically state that
>no personal information will be collected or that it is anonymous.
>Within the profile section of the survey, we do not collect personal
>information.  However, in instructions and announcement we do mention the
>"resume later" function that states that the participant can create an ID
>to return and complete the survey later.  In that process, the email
>address, and a name is collected.
>
>This is one of several reasons that ICANN Council preferred the survey be
>hosted within ICANN.
>
>The email addresses I pulled from the tool, are only email addresses.  If
>the team agrees about sending a notice, the email would be sent from a
>designated ICANN email address and all recipients will be listed as a BCC.
>
>Please advise if we should proceed.
>
>Thank you.  B
>
>Berry Cobb
>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>720.839.5735
>mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>@berrycobb
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Don Blumenthal
>Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 14:54
>To: gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx; mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Survey Stats
>
>
>Berry,
>
>Thanks. I forget what we may have said in connection with collecting the
>information and can't check because my cell is my only access today. How
>did you connect the address to the the fact that the survey wasn't
>completed? Can somebody who gets the message raise issues about response
>anonymity?
>
>Don
>
>Sent from my PDA phone
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Berry Cobb [mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Received: Wednesday, 24 Oct 2012, 4:58pm
>To: gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx [gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
>Subject: RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Survey Stats
>
>Team,
>
>
>
>I¹ve captured the email addresses of those survey participants who saved
>partial responses within the survey tool. I will construct an email to
>notify this group of the friendly reminder to complete the survey by 31
>October 2012. The email will be sent from the policy-staff@xxxxxxxxx
>email address.
>
>
>
>Thank you. B
>
>
>
>Berry Cobb
>
>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>
>720.839.5735
>
>mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>@berrycobb
>
>Sent from my PDA phone
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature