RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] Project List Update
- To: "Jaime B Wagner" <j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ken Bour" <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] Project List Update
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:55:01 -0500
When the Council does its prioritization, our project will hopefully be done
and hence will not need to be included.
From: Jaime B Wagner [mailto:j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 8:44 AM
To: 'Ken Bour'; Gomes, Chuck; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RES: [gnso-wpm-dt] Project List Update
BTW, our work on the WPM-team isn't itself a project?
De: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Em
nome de Ken Bour
Enviada em: terça-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2010 18:47
Para: 'Gomes, Chuck'; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Assunto: [gnso-wpm-dt] Project List Update
Chuck and WPM Team:
Liz asked Margie to provide that short description for RRVI. I will
ask her if she can modify it per your comment.
Re: STI, I haven't been actively managing the list of projects, but I
am happy to shift STI to Table 2 and code is as "Implem" if that is its current
I will produce a new version shortly.
Thanks for the follow up.
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:26 PM
To: Ken Bour; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] Project List Update
I am probably forgetting something, but why do we still include STI?
It is in the implementation stage.
It seems to me that the description for the RRVI project should be
about the PDP not the charter drafting team. The charter DT will be finished
[mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken Bour
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 9:04 AM
Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] Project List Update
The Project List (now KBv6) has been updated to include
"Registry/Registrar Vertical Integration" (RRVI), which is included in Table 1
of "Prioritized Projects." There are now 17 total projects in Table 1 pending
further re-categorization action by the team.