[gnso-wpm-dt] Re: Prioritization Process - Motion

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
this motion needs a second.
Regards
Olga

2010/6/14 Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>

> Hi,
>
> I am sending the folowing motion for your consideration.
>
> Best regards
>
> Olga
>
> *
> *
>
> *GNSO COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Re: Work Prioritization)*
>
> WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 April 2010 meeting, adopted a resolution
> and timeline<https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions>to 
> conduct its first Work Prioritization effort according to a set of
> procedures (proposed Chapter 6 and 
> ANNEX<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/wpmg-section-6-and-annex-09apr10-en.pdf>)
> recommended by the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT);
>
> WHEREAS, the adopted timeline outlined four major process steps the first
> three of which have been completed as follows:
>
> 1)      Step 1:  ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the GNSO
> Council a recommended Work Prioritization Project 
> List<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-en.pdf>
>  (v1.0),
> including a Cover 
> Letter<http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/cover-letter-work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-en.pdf>,
> on 30 April 2010 [Council approved on 20 May 
> 2010<http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/>
> ]
>
> 2)      Step 2:  Eighteen Councilors and one Liaison (19 total) submitted
> individual Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects (approved in Step 1)
> on or before 9 June (deadline extended from 7 June), which were then
> successfully processed and aggregated by Staff for input to Step 3;
>
> 3)      Step 3:  The GNSO Council held a Work Prioritization group
> discussion session on 19 June 2010 in Brussels and successfully finalized a
> set of Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects;
>
> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
>
> RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the GNSO Work Prioritization Value
> Ratings finalized in its group discussion session held on 19 June 2010 and
> directs Staff to publish those Value Ratings on the GNSO website according
> to Step 4 of the adopted timeline.
>