Registrar Stakeholder Group Position - Process for gTLD Registry Agreement Amendment
April 1, 2010
Registrar Stakeholder Group Position on Process for gTLD
Registry Agreement Amendment
BACKGROUND
In March 2010, the Registrar Stakeholder Group ("RrSG") was asked to provide
feedback regarding the Process for gTLD Registry Agreement Amendment. This
position paper captures the overall sentiment expressed by the RrSG members who
provided feedback about this matter. Due to time constraints, however, no
formal vote regarding this position paper was taken.
RrSG POSITION
Consistent with its previously stated position[1], the RrSG strongly opposes
any version of unilateral contract amendment authority, including the amendment
process proposed in the New gTLD Draft Applicant Guidebook Version 3.
The RrSG also opposes the creation of any new amendment process meant to
address contract matters within the "picket fence." There are well-developed
mechanisms already in place that allow the community to modify registry
contracts for issues inside the picket fence when necessary. These mechanisms
are also appropriate for picket fence-related issues in the New gTLD Registry
Agreements, and thus no new amendment process is necessary.
With respect to issues outside the picket fence, RrSG members are currently
discussing and evaluating a variety of alternative amendment processes,
including the proposals outlined in ICANN's Explanatory Memorandum. At this
time, however, the RrSG reaffirms its position that any process which permits
unilateral contract amendments is unacceptable.
CONCLUSION
The opinions expressed by the RrSG in this position paper should not be
interpreted to reflect the individual opinion of any particular RrSG member.
________________________________
[1] See Registrar Stakeholder Group Position on Proposed New gTLD Registry
Agreement, available at http://forum.icann.org/lists/3gtld-guide/msg00101.html
(published Nov. 22 2009).
Attachment:
RSG Position - gTLD Registry Agreement Amendment FINAL.pdf |