<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gtld-council] NCUC proposals to amend gnso recommendations on new gtld policy
- To: <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gtld-council] NCUC proposals to amend gnso recommendations on new gtld policy
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:40:49 -0400
Thanks Robin for the work put into this. The areas for which the NCUC
made suggestions seem to me to involve recommendations that need more
work before finalizing them so I would hope that we will spend
considerable time discussing them. I forwarded them to the RyC list and
to the RN-WG list for comment from memb
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robin Gross
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 1:23 PM
> To: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gtld-council] NCUC proposals to amend gnso
> recommendations on new gtld policy
>
> NCUC has developed 5 new proposals to amend the draft gnso
> recommendations on new gtld policy.
>
> These proposals are meant to give some recognition to freedom
> of expression values in our recommendations. The proposals
> also address concerns about ICANN becoming enmeshed in
> national policy debates and would keep the Internet core
> neutral of such conflicts.
>
> The 5 proposals are not meant to be accepted only as a
> package, but should be considered individually also.
>
> NCUC proposals to amend draft GNSO recommendations:
> http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/062007.html
>
> I welcome an opportunity to discuss the amendments at greater
> length and will try to answer any questions you may have on them.
>
> Thank you for considering them.
>
> Best,
> Robin
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|