RE: [gtld-council] NCUC stmt on new gtld policy recommendations

[Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck,

a friendly remark to say I´m not sure about the reason why you
need to know this, nor am I clear in what capacity you´re
asking. What I can tell you, however, is that generally
individual members of our constituency, including the reps on
the council, may take the lead in drafting inputs, then seek for
the constituents amendments and/or support. And I can assure you
that this impact statement has generated more expressions of
interest and support from our constituency members than some of
our draft inputs to the PDP itself. As a NCUC rep on the
council, I figure I can only surrender to such surge of
participation and approval that Robin has managed to gather on
this statement. 

Please, also note that a constituecy like NCUC (maybe also the
Business´) can only be less homogeneous than one like RyC or
Registrars´, since we don´t represent a unique sector of
activities in this grouping as the registries or registrars.
This makes our statements sometimes broader or complex.

I´d advise that you take it as the responsibility of NCUC as a
whole to endorse and put forward the current statement as its
impact statement for the PDP on new gTLDs.

Regards,

Mawaki 

--- "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks Robin.  I in no way meant to imply that only financial
> impacts
> should be considered.  The RyC Impact Statement included
> financial and
> non-financial impacts and I believe that the statement in the
> Bylaws
> asks for both.
> 
> How many non-commercial organizations were involved in the
> development
> of the impact statement?
> 
> Chuck Gomes
>  
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity to
> which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
> privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
> Any
> unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
> prohibited. If
> you have received this message in error, please notify sender
> immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robin Gross [mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 5:30 PM
> > To: Gomes, Chuck
> > Cc: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Milton Mueller; Liz
> Williams
> > Subject: Re: [gtld-council] NCUC stmt on new gtld policy 
> > recommendations
> > 
> > Hi Chuck,
> > 
> > Yes, this is NCUC's impact statement on how the 
> > recommendations will affect our members. 
> > 
> > Since we are the 'non-commercial' constituency, it would
> make 
> > little sense for us to restrict our comments to only 
> > financial impacts on our constituency.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Robin
> > 
> > 
> > Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > 
> > >Robin,
> > >
> > >Is this the Impact Statement that Liz had requested from
> each of the 
> > >constituencies?
> > >
> > >I confess that I have not had time to read the entire 
> > document, but at 
> > >first glance it looks more like an opinion statement than
> an impact 
> > >statement.  Certainly, the opinions of the NCUC are
> important and 
> > >should be considered in the final deliberations of the 
> > Council on the 
> > >report that will be sent to the Board, but unless I am 
> > misunderstanding 
> > >something, the purpose of impact statements is different:  
> > Annex A of 
> > >the ICANN Bylaws, Section 11.c, says that the Final Report 
> > to the Board 
> > >must include "An analysis of how the issue would affect
> each 
> > >constituency, including any financial impact on the 
> > constituency".  I 
> > >presume that Liz needs the impact statements so that she
> can perform 
> > >that analysis for the Council.  Liz - please correct me if
> I 
> > am wrong 
> > >on this.
> > >
> > >Chuck Gomes
> > > 
> > >"This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity to 
> > >which it is addressed, and may contain information that is 
> > privileged, 
> > >confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law. Any 
> > >unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly 
> > prohibited. 
> > >If you have received this message in error, please notify
> sender 
> > >immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> > > 
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > >>[mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Robin Gross
> > >>Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 3:56 PM
> > >>To: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>Cc: Milton Mueller; Liz Williams
> > >>Subject: [gtld-council] NCUC stmt on new gtld policy
> recommendations
> > >>
> > >>NCUC Statement on PDP-Dec05:
> > >>
> > >>  
> >
>
>>http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/drafts/PDP-Dec05-NCUC-CONST-STM
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >T-JUNE2007.htm
> > >  
> > >
> > >>       or
> > >> 
> >
>
>>http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/drafts/PDP-Dec05-NCUC-CONST-STM
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >T-JUNE2007.pdf
> > >  
> > >
> > >>Thanks,
> > >>Robin
> > >>
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
>